I didn't set out to become a Life Expansion Coach. I set out to survive. This is the story of what happened in between — the childhood I minimised, the relationship I didn't name for years, the moment something cracked open, and what I built out of the pieces.
I'm writing this because I think the origin story matters. Not because coaches are obligated to perform their trauma, but because the work I do is not theoretical. I know the forest from the inside. I know what it feels like to be completely functional on the surface and completely lost underneath. I know the specific silence that forms when you can't name what's happening to you because you don't have the language and you're not sure anyone would believe you if you did.
And I know what it feels like when something finally shifts.
I grew up in a household where things were not said directly. This is true of many households. Mine was not unusual in that sense — there was love in it, and there were also patterns I absorbed so early and so completely that I didn't recognise them as patterns. I thought they were just how people were. How relationships worked. What love meant.
I learned early to monitor the emotional temperature of the room. To adjust myself in response to other people's moods. To make myself useful, palatable, easy. To earn my place rather than assume it was given.
I was a high achiever. Chartered accountant. Good at structure, good at systems, good at the kind of performance that looks like success from the outside and can, for a long time, mask the cost of maintaining it. I built a life. I had relationships. I had children. I was, by any external measure, fine.
I'm not going to name him. I'll call him the A-hole, which is accurate.
The relationship started the way these things often start — with someone who was attentive and particular and made me feel seen in a way I wasn't used to. I know now that this is a pattern. At the time, I just thought I'd been lucky.
What followed was gradual. That's the word that matters. Gradual. Coercive control doesn't arrive all at once, announcing itself clearly. It settles in slowly. It redefines normal. It works by making you doubt your own perception until you're no longer sure what's real and what you've invented.
There were things I explained away. Things I minimised. Things I didn't tell anyone because I knew how they would sound and I didn't want to deal with the response. And there was the constant, exhausting work of managing his moods — of reading the room, of adjusting, of making myself smaller so there was less of me to be a target.
I had been practicing that skill my whole life. I was very good at it.
It took longer than I want to admit to name what was happening. Not because I was stupid — I was not stupid — but because naming it meant confronting the distance between the story I'd been telling and what was actually true. That is a very hard thing to do, particularly when the other person has spent years working to make sure you doubt the evidence of your own experience.
I don't remember the single moment it broke open. I remember a period. A few months of something slowly surfacing. Of conversations I'd been avoiding with myself becoming impossible to avoid. Of reading things and recognising things and having that specific feeling of: this is describing me. This is what this is called. There's a word for this.
Language is not everything. But having language for your experience is not nothing. When you've been living something nameless, having a name for it does something. It separates you from it slightly. It makes it a thing you're experiencing rather than a thing you simply are.
I left.
Leaving is not the end. I want to say that clearly because a lot of the cultural narrative around abusive relationships treats leaving as the resolution. It isn't. It's the beginning of a different kind of work.
I found the Freedom Programme. For anyone who doesn't know it: it's a programme developed specifically for women who've experienced domestic abuse. I wasn't sure, when I started, that I was supposed to be there. I didn't think my experience was bad enough. That's a very common thought, by the way. It's also part of how coercive control works — by making you feel that what happened to you doesn't count.
It counted.
The Freedom Programme gave me the first coherent framework for understanding what had happened. For the first time, I had language for the specific dynamics I'd been living. I could see the patterns. I could see where they came from — not just in the relationship, but further back, into the childhood patterns that had made me such a good candidate for a relationship like that.
This was not comfortable knowledge. But it was true knowledge. And true knowledge, however uncomfortable, is the beginning of being able to do something different.
At some point in this process — and I say "at some point" because healing is not linear and I can't place it neatly on a timeline — I enrolled to study at Birmingham City University. I'm completing my MSc in Psychology and Counselling Studies.
People sometimes ask me why, given that I'm already working as a coach. The answer is that I wanted the formal container. I was already doing this work intuitively, from lived experience and self-directed study. I wanted the academic grounding. I wanted to know that the theoretical underpinning was as rigorous as the lived experience it sat alongside. I wanted to be able to say, with confidence: I understand the research. I understand the theory. I know why this works, not just that it works.
What BCU gave me, beyond the academic framework, was the experience of being in a room with people who were taking the psychological dimensions of human experience seriously. That matters. It continues to matter.
Soulful Horizons started as an idea born from a specific frustration: the resources available to women who'd been through what I'd been through were either clinical (and therefore not accessible to everyone) or were wellness-branded in a way that felt hollow to me. Gentle. Careful. Full of careful language that softened everything into palatability.
What I needed — what I hadn't been able to find — was something that was both grounded and direct. Something that held the safety of the Sacred Whispers work (the understanding, the making-sense-of-it, the careful and unhurried container) and the energy of F*CK Staying Silent (the anger that is actually information, the permission to be done, the roar that follows the held work).
So I built it.
The frameworks I use — the Forest, the Lantern, the Compass — came directly from my own experience of navigating this. They are not abstract constructs. They are descriptions of things that actually happened to me, translated into language and structure that might be useful to someone else.
The two voices — Sacred Whispers and F*CK Staying Silent — are both real parts of me. Sacred Whispers is who I was in the early, careful, still-figuring-it-out years. F*CK Staying Silent is who I became on the other side. They're not opposites. They're sequential. You can't get to the roar without doing the quiet work first.
I know that because I've been both of them. I know that because I still contain both of them.
This work is personal. Not performatively personal — I'm not sharing my story to prove anything or to establish credibility or to make you feel sorry for me. I'm sharing it because I think it's important that the people I work with know that I am not operating from the outside. I know the forest. I've been in it. I've found my way to clearings in it, multiple times.
And I know that the way you get there is not by having a perfect map. It's by having enough light to see the next step. It's by having language for the thing you're experiencing. It's by being in the room with someone who isn't going to flinch at the truth of what you're carrying.
That's what I'm here for.
The Uprising — honest words in your inbox. No filler, no schedule, no pitch.